Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the Applicability of J-M Distance Feature Selection Methods for Coastal Wetland Classification.

Authors :
Zhang, Xianmei
Lin, Xiaofeng
Fu, Dongjie
Wang, Yang
Sun, Shaobo
Wang, Fei
Wang, Cuiping
Xiao, Zhongyong
Shi, Yiqiang
Source :
Water (20734441); Jun2023, Vol. 15 Issue 12, p2212, 16p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Accurate determination of the spatial distribution of coastal wetlands is crucial for the management and conservation of ecosystems. Feature selection methods based on the Jeffries-Matusita (J-M) method include J-M distance with simple average ranking (JM<subscript>ave</subscript>), J-M distance based on weights and correlations (JM<subscript>improved</subscript>), and heuristic J-M distance (JM<subscript>mc</subscript>). However, as the impacts of these methods on wetland classification are different, their applicability has rarely been investigated. Based on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) and random forest (RF) classifier, this is a comparative analysis of the applicability of the JM<subscript>ave</subscript>, JM<subscript>improved</subscript>, and JM<subscript>mc</subscript> methods. The results show that the three methods compress feature dimensions and retain all feature types as much as possible. JM<subscript>mc</subscript> exhibits the most significant compression from a value of 35 to 15 (57.14%), which is 37.14% and 40% more compressed than JM<subscript>ave</subscript> and JM<subscript>improved</subscript>, respectively. Moreover, they produce comparable classification results, with an overall classification accuracy of 90.20 ± 0.19% and a Kappa coefficient of 88.80 ± 0.22%. However, different methods had their own advantages for the classification of different land classes. Specifically, JM<subscript>ave</subscript> has a better classification only in cropland, while JM<subscript>mc</subscript> is advantageous for recognizing water bodies, tidal flats, and aquaculture. While JM<subscript>improved</subscript> failed to retain vegetation and mangrove features, it enables a better depiction of the mangroves, salt pans, and vegetation classes. Both JM<subscript>ave</subscript> and JM<subscript>improved</subscript> rearrange features based on J-M distance, while JM<subscript>mc</subscript> places more emphasis on feature selection. As a result, there can be significant differences in feature subsets among these three methods. Therefore, the comparative analysis of these three methods further elucidates the importance of J-M distance in feature selection, demonstrating the significant potential of J-M distance-based feature selection methods in wetland classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20734441
Volume :
15
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Water (20734441)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164684431
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122212