Back to Search Start Over

Lung Recruitment Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT): A Multicenter Study of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors :
Jonkman, Annemijn H.
Alcala, Glasiele C.
Pavlovsky, Bertrand
Roca, Oriol
Spadaro, Savino
Scaramuzzo, Gaetano
Lu Chen
Dianti, Jose
de A. Sousa, Mayson L.
Sklar, Michael C.
Piraino, Thomas
Huiqing Ge
Guang-Qiang Chen
Jian-Xin Zhou
Jie Li
Goligher, Ewan C.
Costa, Eduardo
Mancebo, Jordi
Mauri, Tommaso
Amato, Marcelo
Source :
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine; 7/1/2023, Vol. 208 Issue 1, Following p25-38, 19p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Rationale: Defining lung recruitability is needed for safe positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection in mechanically ventilated patients. However, there is no simple bedside method including both assessment of recruitability and risks of overdistension as well as personalized PEEP titration. Objectives: To describe the range of recruitability using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), effects of PEEP on recruitability, respiratory mechanics and gas exchange, and a method to select optimal EIT-based PEEP. Methods: This is the analysis of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) from an ongoing multicenter prospective physiological study including patients with moderate-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome of different causes. EIT, ventilator data, hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases were obtained during PEEP titration maneuvers. EIT-based optimal PEEP was defined as the crossing point of the overdistension and collapse curves during a decremental PEEP trial. Recruitability was defined as the amount of modifiable collapse when increasing PEEP from 6 to 24 cm H<subscript>2</subscript>O (ΔCollapse<subscript>24–6</subscript>). Patients were classified as low, medium, or high recruiters on the basis of tertiles of ΔCollapse24–6. Measurements and Main Results: In 108 patients with COVID-19, recruitability varied from 0.3% to 66.9% and was unrelated to acute respiratory distress syndrome severity. Median EIT-based PEEP differed between groups: 10 versus 13.5 versus 15.5 cm H<subscript>2</subscript>O for low versus medium versus high recruitability (P, 0.05). This approach assigned a different PEEP level from the highest compliance approach in 81% of patients. The protocol was well tolerated; in four patients, the PEEP level did not reach 24 cm H<subscript>2</subscript>O because of hemodynamic instability. Conclusions: Recruitability varies widely among patients with COVID-19. EIT allows personalizing PEEP setting as a compromise between recruitability and overdistension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1073449X
Volume :
208
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164663114
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202212-2300OC