Current testing programs for pesticides adequately capture endocrine activity and adversity for protection of vertebrate wildlife.

The toxicity and ecotoxicity of pesticide active ingredients are evaluated by a number of standardized test methods using vertebrate animals. These standard test methods are required under various regulatory programs for the registration of pesticides. Over the past two decades, additional test methods have been developed with endpoints that are responsive to endocrine activity and subsequent adverse effects. This article examines the available test methods and their endpoints that are relevant to an assessment of endocrine‐disrupting properties of pesticides. Furthermore, the article highlights how weight‐of‐evidence approaches should be applied to determine whether an adverse response in (eco)toxicity tests is caused by an endocrine mechanism of action. The large number of endpoints in the current testing paradigms for pesticides make it unlikely that endocrine activity and adversity is being overlooked. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;19:1089–1109. © 2023 Bayer CropScience and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). Key Points: Current testing paradigms for pesticides include numerous endpoints addressing endocrine activity and adversity.A weight‐of‐evidence evaluation of test results is essential to assessing potential endocrine activity and/or adverse effects resulting from endocrine activity.The large number of endpoints in the current testing paradigms for pesticides make it unlikely that endocrine activity and adversity is being overlooked. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]