Back to Search Start Over

AI-Based Automated Lipomatous Tumor Segmentation in MR Images: Ensemble Solution to Heterogeneous Data.

Authors :
Liu, Chih-Chieh
Abdelhafez, Yasser G.
Yap, S. Paran
Acquafredda, Francesco
SchirĂ², Silvia
Wong, Andrew L.
Sarohia, Dani
Bateni, Cyrus
Darrow, Morgan A.
Guindani, Michele
Lee, Sonia
Zhang, Michelle
Moawad, Ahmed W.
Ng, Quinn Kwan-Tai
Shere, Layla
Elsayes, Khaled M.
Maroldi, Roberto
Link, Thomas M.
Nardo, Lorenzo
Qi, Jinyi
Source :
Journal of Digital Imaging; Jun2023, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p1049-1059, 11p, 3 Diagrams, 1 Chart, 4 Graphs
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has been proposed to automate image segmentation and provide accuracy, consistency, and efficiency. Accurate segmentation of lipomatous tumors (LTs) is critical for correct tumor radiomics analysis and localization. The major challenge of this task is data heterogeneity, including tumor morphological characteristics and multicenter scanning protocols. To mitigate the issue, we aimed to develop a DL-based Super Learner (SL) ensemble framework with different data correction and normalization methods. Pathologically proven LTs on pre-operative T1-weighted/proton-density MR images of 185 patients were manually segmented. The LTs were categorized by tumor locations as distal upper limb (DUL), distal lower limb (DLL), proximal upper limb (PUL), proximal lower limb (PLL), or Trunk (T) and grouped by 80%/9%/11% for training, validation and testing. Six configurations of correction/normalization were applied to data for fivefold-cross-validation trainings, resulting in 30 base learners (BLs). A SL was obtained from the BLs by optimizing SL weights. The performance was evaluated by dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, specificity, and Hausdorff distance (HD95). For predictions of the BLs, the average DSC, sensitivity, and specificity from the testing data were 0.72 ± 0.16, 0.73 ± 0.168, and 0.99 ± 0.012, respectively, while for SL predictions were 0.80 ± 0.184, 0.78 ± 0.193, and 1.00 ± 0.010. The average HD95 of the BLs were 11.5 (DUL), 23.2 (DLL), 25.9 (PUL), 32.1 (PLL), and 47.9 (T) mm, whereas of SL were 1.7, 8.4, 15.9, 2.2, and 36.6 mm, respectively. The proposed method could improve the segmentation accuracy and mitigate the performance instability and data heterogeneity aiding the differential diagnosis of LTs in real clinical situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08971889
Volume :
36
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Digital Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164473111
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-023-00785-1