Back to Search Start Over

Acceptability and Adherence to Home, Kiosk, and Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement Compared to 24-H Ambulatory Monitoring.

Authors :
Thompson, Matthew J.
Anderson, Melissa L.
Cook, Andrea J.
Ehrlich, Kelly
Hall, Yoshio N.
Hsu, Clarissa
Margolis, Karen L.
McClure, Jennifer B.
Munson, Sean A.
Green, Beverly B.
Source :
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; Jun2023, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p1854-1861, 8p, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends measuring blood pressure (BP) outside of clinic/office settings. While various options are available, including home devices, BP kiosks, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), understanding patient acceptability and adherence is a critical factor for implementation. Objective: To compare the acceptability and adherence of clinic, home, kiosk, and ABPM measurement. Design: Comparative diagnostic accuracy study which randomized adults to one of three BP measurement arms: clinic, home, and kiosk. ABPM was conducted on all participants. Participants: Adults (18–85 years) receiving care at 12 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care clinics (Washington State, USA) with a high BP (≥ 138 mmHg systolic or ≥ 88 mmHg diastolic) in the electronic health record with no hypertension diagnosis and on no hypertensive medications and with high BP at a research screening visit. Measures: Patient acceptability was measured using a validated survey which was used to calculate an overall acceptability score (range 1–7) at baseline, after completing their assigned BP measurement intervention, and after completing ABPM. Adherence was defined based on the pre-specified number of BP measurements completed. Key Results: Five hundred ten participants were randomized (mean age 59 years), with mean BP of 150/88. Overall acceptability score was highest (i.e. most acceptable) for Home BP (mean 6.2, SD 0.7) and lowest (least acceptable) for ABPM (mean 5.0, SD 1.0); scores were intermediate for Clinic (5.5, SD 1.1) and Kiosk (5.4, SD 1.0). Adherence was higher for Home (154/170, 90.6%) and Clinic (150/172, 87.2%) than for Kiosk (114/168, 67.9%)). The majority of participants (467/510, 91.6%) were adherent to ABPM. Conclusions: Participants found home BP measurement most acceptable followed by clinic, BP kiosks, and ABPM. Our findings, coupled with recent evidence regarding the accuracy of home BP measurement, further support the routine use of home-based BP measurement in primary care practice in the US. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03130257 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03130257 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08848734
Volume :
38
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164354676
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08036-3