Identifying spastic variant of type II achalasia after treatment with high‐resolution manometry and FLIP Panometry.

Background: Panesophageal pressurization (PEP) defines type II achalasia on high‐resolution‐manometry (HRM) but some patients exhibit spasm after treatment. The Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0 proposed high PEP values as predictor of embedded spasm, yet supportive evidence is lacking. Methods: Fifty seven type II achalasia patients (47 ± 18 years, 54% males) with HRM and LIP Panometry before and after treatment were retrospectively identified. Baseline HRM and FLIP studies were analyzed to identify factors associated with post‐treatment spasm, defined on HRM per CC v4.0. Results: Seven patients (12%) had spasm following treatment (peroral endoscopic myotomy 47%; pneumatic dilation [PD] 37%; laparoscopic Heller myotomy 16%). At baseline, greater median maximum PEP pressure (MaxPEP) values on HRM (77 vs 55 mmHg, p = 0.045) and spastic‐reactive contractile response pattern on FLIP (43% vs 8%, p = 0.033) were more common in patients with post‐treatment spasm while absent contractile response on FLIP was more common in patients without spasm (14% vs 66%, p = 0.014). The strongest predictor of post‐treatment spasm was the percentage of swallows with MaxPEP ≥70 mmHg (best cut‐off: ≥30%), with AUROC of 0.78. A combination of MaxPEP <70 mmHg and FLIP 60 mL pressure < 40 mmHg identified patients with lower rates of post‐treatment spasm (3% overall, 0% post‐PD) compared to those with values above these thresholds (33% overall, 83% post‐PD). Conclusions: High maximum PEP values, high FLIP 60 mL pressures and contractile response pattern on FLIP Panometry prior to treatment identified type II achalasia patients more likely to exhibit post‐treatment spasm. Evaluating these features may guide personalized patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]