Proceedings of the 5th UK Implementation Science Research Conference.

Published 2017 Aug 29. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3 O9 A standardised method for the economic evaluation of implementation programmes: evaluating... Carlos Sillero-Rejon1,2, Hugh McLeod1,2, Brent C. Opmeer1, William Hollingworth1,2, Karen Luy... 1National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) a... Correspondence: Carlos Sillero-Rejon (mailto:carlos.sillerorejon@bristol.ac.uk) I Implementation Science 2023 i , B 18(Suppl 1): b O9 B Background b Methods for the economic evaluation of implementation initiatives to increase the uptake of cost-effective healthcare interventions are not standardised. Guided by a Theory of Change, co-developed with implementation stakeholders, we assessed the impact of PCF implementation on care and work processes, workforce and patient/carer experience, health inequalities, and the implementation process. B Conclusion b Implementing eHealth into such a complex system is a multifaceted process involving multiple stakeholders. P20 Withdrawn P21 Expert consensus on multilevel implementation hypotheses to promote uptake of youth care... Evelien Dubbeldeman, Rianne van der Kleij, Evelyn Brakema, Matty Crone 1Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, P.O. Box 960... Correspondence: Evelien Dubbeldeman (mailto:e.m.dubbeldeman@lumc.nl) I Implementation Science 2023 i , B 18(Suppl 1): b P21 B Background b The implementation of evidence-based youth care guidelines remains a complex process. B Conclusion b Determinants related to knowledge, skills, and engagement of professionals and management were found to be relevant for the implementation of youth care guidelines.. This study provides a set of hypotheses that could facilitate organizations, policy makers, and professionals to guide the implementation process of youth care guidelines to, ultimately, improve implementation outcomes. [Extracted from the article]