Back to Search Start Over

Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation.

Authors :
Keit, Emily
Liveringhouse, Casey
Figura, Nicholas
Weygand, Joseph
Sandoval, Maria L.
Garcia, Genevieve
Peters, Julia
Nieder, Michael
Faramand, Rawan
Khimani, Farhad
Kim, Sungjune
Robinson, Timothy J.
Johnstone, Peter A.S.
Penagaricano, Jose
Latifi, Kujtim
Source :
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment; 6/8/2023, p1-9, 9p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for the inferior body which can result in heterogeneous doses. Here, we describe our institution's unique protocol for delivering high-dose TBI entirely with VMAT and retrospectively compare dosimetric outcomes with helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Additionally, we describe our method of oropharyngeal mucosal sparing that was implemented after fatal mucositis occurred in two patients. Methods: Thirty-one patients were simulated and treated in head-first (HFS) and feet-first (FFS) orientations. Patients were treated with VMAT (n = 26) or HT (n = 5). In VMAT plans, to synchronize doses between the orientations, images were deformably registered and the HFS dose was transferred to the FFS plan and used as a background dose when optimizing plans. Six to eight isocenters with two arcs per isocenter were generated. HT was delivered with an established technique. Patients were treated to 13.2 Gy over eight twice daily fractions. Dosimetric outcomes and toxicities were retrospectively compared. Results: Prescription dose and organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met for all patients. Lower lung doses were achieved with VMAT relative to HT plans (7.4 vs 7.7 Gy, P =.009). Statistically significant improvement in mucositis was not achieved after adopting a mucosal-sparing technique, however lower doses to the oropharyngeal mucosal were achieved (6.9 vs 14.1 Gy, P =.009), and no further mucositis-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This full-body VMAT method of TBI achieves dose goals, eliminates risk of heterogenous doses within the femur, and demonstrates that selective OAR sparing with the purpose of reducing TBI-related morbidity and mortality is possible at any institution with a VMAT-capable linear accelerator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15330346
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164221732
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338231180779