Back to Search
Start Over
The Fairness in Algorithmic Fairness.
- Source :
- Res Publica (13564765); Jun2023, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p265-281, 17p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- With the increasing use of algorithms in high-stakes areas such as criminal justice and health has come a significant concern about the fairness of prediction-based decision procedures. In this article I argue that a prominent class of mathematically incompatible performance parity criteria can all be understood as applications of John Broome's account of fairness as the proportional satisfaction of claims. On this interpretation these criteria do not disagree on what it means for an algorithm to be fair. Rather they express different understandings of what grounds a claim to a good being allocated by an algorithmic decision procedure. I then argue that an important implication of the Broomean interpretation is that it strengthens the case for outcome-based criteria. Finally, I consider how a version of the levelling-down objection to performance parity criteria arises within the Broomean account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- FAIRNESS
ALGORITHMS
ARTIFICIAL intelligence
DECISION making
ETHICS
PREDICTION models
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 13564765
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Res Publica (13564765)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 163852947
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-022-09546-3