Back to Search Start Over

Sensitivity of WRF/Chem simulated PM2.5 to initial/boundary conditions and planetary boundary layer parameterization schemes over the Indo-Gangetic Plain.

Authors :
Gunwani, Preeti
Govardhan, Gaurav
Jena, Chinmay
Yadav, Prafull
Kulkarni, Santosh
Debnath, Sreyashi
Pawar, Pooja V.
Khare, Manoj
Kaginalkar, Akshara
Kumar, Rajesh
Wagh, Sandeep
Chate, Dilip
Ghude, Sachin D.
Source :
Environmental Monitoring & Assessment; May2023, Vol. 195 Issue 5, p1-17, 17p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The ability of a chemical transport model to simulate accurate meteorological and chemical processes depends upon the physical parametrizations and quality of meteorological input data such as initial/boundary conditions. In this study, weather research and forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) is used to test the sensitivity of PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> predictions to planetary boundary layer (PBL) parameterization schemes (YSU, MYJ, MYNN, ACM2, and Boulac) and meteorological initial/boundary conditions (FNL, ERA-Interim, GDAS, and NCMRWF) over Indo-Gangetic Plain (Delhi, Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan) during the winter period (December 2017 to January 2018). The aim is to select the model configuration for simulating PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> which shows the lowest errors and best agreement with the observed data. The best results were achieved with initial/boundary conditions from ERA and GDAS datasets and local PBL parameterization (MYJ and MYNN). It was also found that PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> concentrations are relatively less sensitive to changes in initial/boundary conditions but in contrast show a stronger sensitivity to changes in the PBL scheme. Moreover, the sensitivity of the simulated PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> to the choice of PBL scheme is more during the polluted hours of the day (evening to early morning), while that to the choice of the meteorological input data is more uniform and subdued over the day. This work indicates the optimal model setup in terms of choice of initial/boundary conditions datasets and PBL parameterization schemes for future air quality simulations. It also highlights the importance of the choice of PBL scheme over the choice of meteorological data set to the simulated PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> by a chemical transport model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01676369
Volume :
195
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Environmental Monitoring & Assessment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163798356
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-10987-3