Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Safety of Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy Using Peroral Cholangioscopy under Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Guidance in Older Adults: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors :
Takahashi, Koji
Ohyama, Hiroshi
Takiguchi, Yuichi
Sekine, Yu
Toyama, Shodai
Yamada, Nana
Sugihara, Chihei
Kan, Motoyasu
Ouchi, Mayu
Nagashima, Hiroki
Iino, Yotaro
Kusakabe, Yuko
Okitsu, Kohichiroh
Ohno, Izumi
Kato, Naoya
Source :
Medicina (1010660X); Apr2023, Vol. 59 Issue 4, p795, 9p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background and objectives: The safety of electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in older adults remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of EHL using peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance in older adults aged ≥80 years. Materials and Methods: This retrospective clinical study was conducted at a single center. Fifty patients with common bile duct stones who underwent EHL using POCS under ERCP guidance at our institution, between April 2017 and September 2022, were enrolled in this study. The eligible patients were divided into an elderly group (n = 21, age ≥80 years) and a non-elderly group (n = 29, age ≤79 years), and were analyzed. Results: A total of 33 and 40 EHL procedures were performed in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. After excluding cases in which stone removal was performed at other institutions, complete removal of common bile duct stones was confirmed in 93.8% and 100% of the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively (p = 0.20). The mean number of ERCPs required for complete removal of bile duct stones was 2.9 and 4.3 in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively (p = 0.17). In the EHL session, the overall occurrence of adverse events was eight and seven in the elderly (24.2%) and non-elderly (17.5%) groups, respectively; however, the difference was insignificant (p = 0.48). Conclusions: EHL using POCS under ERCP guidance is effective in patients aged ≥80 years and there was no significant increase in adverse event rates compared to those aged ≤79 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1010660X
Volume :
59
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Medicina (1010660X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163428795
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040795