Back to Search Start Over

Individual Responsibility and the Ethics of Hoping for a More Just Climate Future.

Authors :
DOUT, CODY C.
OBST, ARTHUR R.
Source :
Environmental Values; Jun2023, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p315-335, 21p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Many have begun to despair that climate justice will prevail even in a minimal form. The affective dimensions of such despair, we suggest, threaten to make climate action appear too demanding. Thus, despair constitutes a moral challenge to individual climate action that has not yet received adequate attention. In response, we defend a duty to act in hope for a more just (climate) future. However, as we see it, this duty falls differentially upon the shoulders of more and less advantaged agents in society. From arguments by Black thinkers like Derrick Bell, we draw a set of distinctions between two types of hope: one for ideal justice, and one for more modest change; and between two types of hopeful actions, those undertaken through formal political channels and those we call 'extra-political' actions; and between two sites of differential moral burdens, those of the privileged and those of the oppressed. Ours is a case for facing even bleak realities, demanding otherwise, and acting in hope to achieve a better future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09632719
Volume :
32
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Environmental Values
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163324053
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3197/096327122X16569260361823