Back to Search Start Over

PROTECTING ALL PARTIES IN COMPENSATED GESTATIONAL SURROGACY AGREEMENTS: ADOPTING THE NEW YORK STATE (OF MIND) APPROACH.

Authors :
BUTLER, KIARA
Source :
Wisconsin Law Review; 2023, Vol. 2023 Issue 1, p381-428, 48p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

At least several thousand children are born annually as a result of surrogacy arrangements. In theory, the intended parents and the surrogate negotiate contractual terms and subsequently execute an agreement outlining each party's respective rights and duties. Ultimately, the intended parents receive the joy of having a child and the surrogate receives monetary compensation for carrying the child. In practice, however, disputes between parties inevitably arise regarding the expected child's medical care, legal parentage, and surrogate compensation. For the past thirty years, New York State statutorily banned all surrogacy agreements. Not only were surrogacy agreements void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy, but parties to these agreements faced civil and criminal penalties, including imprisonment. But recently New York's law radically changed. On February 15, 2021, New York State enacted the Child-Parent Security Act (CPSA), lifting the ban on compensated gestational surrogacy agreements. The CPSA transformed New York into one of the most--if not the most--surrogacy-friendly states. The CPSA codifies novel provisions unlike any other state's laws: it creates an unalterable Surrogates' Bill of Rights, it requires licensure for surrogacy agencies, it enumerates eligibility requirements for intended parents and surrogates, and it implements a consent-based standard to establish legal parenthood of surrogacy-born children. A comprehensive analysis of state surrogacy legislation--namely New York, Michigan, and Wisconsin laws--underscores this Comment's assertion that the CPSA creates the gold-standard approach to protect all parties in compensated gestational surrogacy agreements. Though Michigan and Wisconsin each have distinct surrogacy laws, the legislative effect is the same: both states' laws exacerbate surrogate exploitation and preclude clear paths to establish legal parentage of surrogacy-born children. By contrast, the CPSA eliminates exploitation by codifying surrogates' rights and streamlines the process to establish parentage by expanding the traditional definition of "parent." The CPSA exemplifies model legislation for regulating and enforcing gestational surrogacy agreements; this New York State (of mind) approach should be adopted nationwide. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0043650X
Volume :
2023
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Wisconsin Law Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163201953