Back to Search
Start Over
A new critique of Mou Zongsan's Kantian interpretation of Mengzi's ethics.
- Source :
- Asian Philosophy; May2023, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p94-109, 16p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- The New Confucian philosopher Mou Zongsan once compared the ethics of Mengzi to that of Kant, claiming that Mengzi's ethics shares the same fundamental features with Kant's and can therefore be better understood through a Kantian lens. This paper aims to argue against Mou by elaborating on two important but hitherto insufficiently addressed differences between Kant's and Mengzi's ethics. First, the paper shows that, as opposed to what Mou suggests, passages 6A1 to 6A3 of the Mengzi demonstrate Mengzi's adoption of an a posteriori approach to ethics that stands in direct contrast to Kant's a priori approach. Second, the paper argues that even if we read Kant's ethics in a non-rigorous way that works in favor of Mou's interpretation, ren (humaneness), yi (optimal appropriateness), li (observance of rites), and zhi (wisdom), as the core concepts of Mengzi's ethics, can still hardly be regarded as Kantian moral laws. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- KANTIAN ethics
ETHICS
PHILOSOPHERS
RITES & ceremonies
A priori
WISDOM
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09552367
- Volume :
- 33
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Asian Philosophy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 163169427
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2023.2164406