Back to Search Start Over

Tuberculosis in contacts need not indicate disease transmission.

Authors :
Dahle, U. R.
Nordlvedt, S.
Winje, B. A.
Mannsaaker, T.
Heldal, E.
Sandven, P.
Grewal, H. M. S.
Caugant, D. A.
Source :
Thorax; Feb2005, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p136-137, 2p, 1 Diagram
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

Background: Traditional contact investigation is an important tool for controlling tuberculosis. It may also help to indicate drug susceptibility patterns when Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures are not, available. Such investigations often underestimate the degree of transmission found by genotyping, but overestimation may also occur. This report is the result of a routine successive DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of M tuberculosis isolated in Norway., Method: Fifteen immigrants belonging to the same community were notified with tuberculosis during February to September 2003. The mycobacterial isolates were analysed by RFLP. Results: All 15 patients had social contact with each other and 3 belonged to the same church community. A total of 14 cultures were positive for M tuberculosis. Among these isolates, six different genotypes were found. Five patients had not acquired the infection from the putative source. Conclusions: Reactivation of tuberculosis may occur in contacts during the development of an outbreak. In such situations, traditional contact investigations may overestimate the rate of transmission Found by genotyping of M tuberculosis. When cultures are unavailable and presumed drug susceptibility patterns are based on that of contacts, such overestimation may lead to incorrect treatment of a patient. Contact investigations must be combined with genotyping of M tuberculosis to conclude how tuberculosis is transmitted. This is especially important in persons with several risk factors for infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00406376
Volume :
60
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Thorax
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16301618
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2004.030841