Back to Search Start Over

Potential therapeutic value of new drugs approved in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors :
Lexchin, Joel
Source :
Australian Health Review; 2023, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p203-207, 5p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: To examine the potential therapeutic value of new medicines approved in the US and both approved and not approved in Australia. Methods: A list of new medicines approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 was assembled and it was determined which of these medicines were also approved in Australia. Three metrics – first in class, priority review and therapeutic rating by two independent organisations – were used to determine the potential therapeutic value of the medicines. The percent of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value was compared using each of the three metrics. Results: A total of 273 drugs were approved by the FDA, of which 147 (53.8%) were approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the Australian regulator. For each of these three metrics, the percent of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value approved in Australia was the same: first in class (yes vs no: Chi-squared P = 0.8562), priority review (yes vs no: Chi-squared P = 0.4593), therapeutic rating (major/moderate vs little/no: Chi-squared P = 0.9006). Some of the 126 drugs not approved may be therapeutically important. Conclusions: New medicines approved in the US between 2015 and 2020 without potential significant therapeutic value are as likely to be introduced into Australia as drugs with potential significant therapeutic value. Some potentially valuable drugs may not have been submitted for approval in Australia by the companies making them. What is known about the topic? Different numbers of new medicines are typically introduced in different jurisdictions. What does this paper add? There is no difference in the Australian introduction of medicines with and without potential significant therapeutic value that were approved in the US between 2015 and 2020. What are the implications for practitioners? New medicines should not be assumed to have or not have potential significant therapeutic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01565788
Volume :
47
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Australian Health Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162934899
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22280