Back to Search Start Over

Hospital and laboratory outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who received vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors :
Zaazouee, Mohamed Sayed
Eleisawy, Mahmoud
Abdalalaziz, Amira M.
Elhady, Mahmoud M.
Ali, Omar Adel
Abdelbari, Taghreed Mohamed
Hasan, Sara Mohamed
Almadhoon, Hossam Waleed
Ahmed, Alaa Yehia
Fassad, Alaa Shaban
Elgendy, Rewan
Abdel-Baset, Eman Adnan
Elsayed, Hamis A.
Elsnhory, Ahmed Bostamy
Abdraboh, Alaa Bahaaeldin
Faragalla, Hazem Metwally
Elshanbary, Alaa Ahmed
Kensara, Osama A.
Abdel-Daim, Mohamed M.
Source :
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology; Apr2023, Vol. 396 Issue 4, p607-620, 14p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a wide-ranging spectrum of clinical symptoms, from asymptomatic/mild to severe. Recent research indicates that, among several factors, a low vitamin D level is a modifiable risk factor for COVID-19 patients. This study aims to evaluate the effect of vitamin D on hospital and laboratory outcomes of patients with COVID-19. Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and clinicaltrials.gov were searched until July 2022, using relevant keywords/Mesh terms. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that addressed the topic were included. The Cochrane tool was used to assess the studies' risk of bias, and the data were analyzed using the review manager (RevMan 5.4). We included nine RCTs with 1586 confirmed COVID-19 patients. Vitamin D group showed a significant reduction of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (risk ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.41, 0.84], P = 0.003), and higher change in vitamin D level (standardized mean difference = 2.27, 95% CI [2.08, 2.47], P < 0.00001) compared to the control group. Other studied hospital and laboratory outcomes showed non-significant difference between vitamin D and the control group (P ≥ 0.05). In conclusion, vitamin D reduced the risk of ICU admission and showed superiority in changing vitamin D level compared to the control group. However, other outcomes showed no difference between the two groups. More RCTs are needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00281298
Volume :
396
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162700334
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02360-x