Back to Search
Start Over
Principles responsible for the inconsistent controlling factors of surface soil water content spatial variation across regions and scales.
- Source :
- Journal of Soils & Sediments: Protection, Risk Assessment, & Remediation; Apr2023, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p1877-1888, 12p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Purpose: Inconsistent controlling factors of soil water content (SWC) spatial variation across regions and spatial scales have been acknowledged in previous studies. However, universal principles explaining these inconsistencies are still needed to be explored. The main aim of this study was to conclude the universal principles across regions and scales. Materials and methods: In this study, based on the surface (< 10-cm soil depth) SWC dataset from Meng et al. (2021) (https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3239-2021) and the relevant environmental variables (climate including temperature and precipitation, topography including elevation and slope, soil including sand and clay contents, and vegetation including normalized difference vegetation index or NDVI) in a 1500 km × 1500 km study region in China, we calculated the correlations between them, and identified the controlling factors of surface SWC in different subregions and at different spatial scales. Results and discussion: Local factors like temperature, precipitation, and clay content that controling the vertical soil water replenishment and removal dominated the surface SWC spatial variation in this dry study region (mean SWC ≤ 0.10 m<superscript>3</superscript> m<superscript>−3</superscript>). Nonlocal factors like topography (e.g., elevation and slope) and soil porosity (sand content) determining the lateral soil water redistribution had outweighed effects in the representative wet subregion. In addition, topography also exerted considerable effects on SWC in this study region due to its great spatial variability, especially when spatial scale < 800 km. As NDVI was complicatedly controlled by other environmental variables, its effect on SWC performed dramatic regional differentiation. In contrast, effect of slope on SWC was more associated with its spatial variability as it was independent from other environmental variables. Conclusions: This study emphasized that the inconsistencies of controlling factors of SWC spatial variation can be comprehensively explained by different regimes in the dry and wet conditions, spatial variability of environmental variables and the interactions among different environmental variables. These findings can deepen our understanding of the controls on SWC spatial variation across regions and scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14390108
- Volume :
- 23
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Soils & Sediments: Protection, Risk Assessment, & Remediation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 162638138
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-023-03427-9