Back to Search Start Over

Patient Compliance in Assessing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Urologic Surgery.

Authors :
Grüne, Britta
Menold, Hanna
Lenhart, Maximilian
Mühlbauer, Julia
Walach, Margarete T.
Waldbillig, Frank
Neuberger, Manuel
Nuhn, Philipp
Michel, Maurice S.
Koenig, Julian
Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
Wessels, Frederik
Source :
Urologia Internationalis; Mar2023, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p280-287, 8p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess patient compliance with a newly established electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system after urologic surgery and to identify influencing factors. Methods: Digital surveys were provided to patients undergoing cystectomy, radical or partial nephrectomy, or transurethral resection of bladder tumor via a newly established ePROM system. Participants received a baseline survey preoperatively and several follow-up surveys postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predicting compliance. Results: Of N = 435 eligible patients, n = 338 completed the baseline survey (78.0%). Patients who did not participate were significantly more likely male (p = 0.004) and older than 70 years (p = 0.005). Overall, 206/337 patients (61.3%) completed the survey at 1-month, 167/312 (53.5%) at 3-month, and 142/276 (51.4%) at 6-month follow-up. Lower baseline quality of life (odds ratio: 2.27; p = 0.004) was a significant predictor for dropout at 1-month follow-up. Low educational level was significantly associated with low compliance at 3- (OR: 1.92; p = 0.01) and 6-month follow-up (OR: 2.88; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Acceptable compliance rates can be achieved with ePROMs following urologic surgery. Several factors influence compliance and should be considered when setting-up ePROM surveys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00421138
Volume :
107
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Urologia Internationalis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162633853
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000520755