Comparison of Hard and Soft Cervical Collars for the Management of Odontoid Peg Fractures in the Elderly.

Introduction: Odontoid peg fractures (OF) are the most common cervical spine fracture in the elderly. This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of older patients withOF who had been managed non-operatively with either a hard or soft cervical collar. Materials and Methods: We analysed the retrospective data of the clinical and radiographic records of patients 60 years or older who presented over a 10-year period with OF and were treated non-operatively with a cervical collar. Mortality was the primary outcome measure with mechanism of injury, complications, and fracture healing secondary measures. Results: 45 patients (hard collar n = 22; soft collar n = 23) were included with comparable demographics for frailty and co-morbidities in each group; age was significantly higher in the soft collar group (80.6 vs 86.4 years; P = .0065). Associated injuries and complications were not significantly different overall, or when Type II fractures were separately analysed (P = .435 associated injuries, P = .121 complications). All-causemortality was greater in the soft collar group (30-day mortality hard: 0%, soft: 9%; 1-year mortality hard: 18%, soft: 48% P = .035). However, once corrected for age, this proved not to reach significance (P = .333) in any fracture type. Non-union was common (77%) but was not significantly different (hard = 70%; soft = 87%; P = .419). Discussion: Consistent with other reports, non-union rates remained substantial regardless of which collar was used. After controlling for age, there was no difference in all-causemortality between elderly patients treated with a hard or soft cervical collar for odontoid peg fractures. Conclusions: Soft collars appear suitable for the treatment of odontoid peg fractures in the elderly without compromising outcome. Larger cohort analyses will help confirm this finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]