Back to Search Start Over

Patient–physician conversations about life-sustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments.

Authors :
Tuesen, Lone Doris
Bülow, Hans-Henrik
Ågård, Anne Sophie
Strøm, Sverre Maintz
Fromme, Erik
Jensen, Hanne Irene
Source :
Palliative & Supportive Care; Feb2023, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p20-26, 7p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective: In 2019, the Danish parliament issued legislation requiring Danish physicians to clarify and honor seriously ill patients' treatment preferences. The American POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) document could be a valuable model for this process. The aim of the study was to examine patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment and participant assessment of a Danish POLST form. Methods: The study is a prospective intervention based on a pilot-tested Danish POLST form. Participant assessments were examined using questionnaire surveys. Patients with serious illness and/or frailty from seven hospital wards, two general practitioners, and four nursing homes were included. The patients and their physicians completed the POLST form based on a process of shared decision-making. Results: A total of 95 patients (aged 41–95) participated. Hereof, 88% declined cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 83% preferred limited medical interventions or comfort care, and 74% did not require artificial nutrition. The preferences were similar within age groups, genders, and locations, but with a tendency toward younger patients being more in favor of full treatment and nursing home residents being more in favor of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Questionnaire response rates were 69% (66/95) for patients, 79% (22/28) for physicians, and 31% (9/29) for nurses. Hereof, the majority of patients, physicians, and nurses found that the POLST form was usable for conversations and decision-making about life-sustaining treatment to either a high or very high degree. Significance of results: The majority of seriously ill patients did not want a resuscitation attempt and opted for selected treatments. The majority of participants found that the Danish POLST was usable for conversations and decisions about life-sustaining treatment to either a high or a very high degree, and that the POLST form facilitated an opportunity to openly discuss life-sustaining treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14789515
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Palliative & Supportive Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162053931
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951521001875