Back to Search Start Over

Six steps for building a technological knowledge base for future taxonomic work.

Authors :
Orr, Michael C
Feijó, Anderson
Chesters, Douglas
Vogler, Alfried P
Bossert, Silas
Ferrari, Rafael R
Costello, Mark John
Hughes, Alice C
Krogmann, Lars
Ascher, John S
Zhou, Xin
Li, De-Zhu
Bai, Ming
Chen, Jun
Ge, Deyan
Luo, Arong
Qiao, Gexia
Williams, Paul H
Zhang, Ai-bing
Ma, Keping
Source :
National Science Review; Dec2022, Vol. 9 Issue 12, p1-3, 3p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Species are the principal category we use to study, understand, and conserve the natural world, so how we define species has a cascading impact across fields, well beyond biology [[1]]. Generalized workflows can be created by incorporating public sequence data and species delimitation methods [[6]], and these can be hosted online, like BOLD's BIN system for short DNA barcodes, but similar public data systems remain unrealized for many other data types. Since these data may disagree in species delineations (for example, DNA and morphology), we must explicitly state the justifications of new species designations and lines of evidence employed in revisions and elsewhere, including how they have been integrated. [Extracted from the article]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20955138
Volume :
9
Issue :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
National Science Review
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161902342
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac284