Back to Search Start Over

Oncologist-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Enrolling Patients in Optimization Trials That Test Less Intense Cancer Treatment.

Authors :
Rocque, Gabrielle B.
Andrews, Courtney
Lawhon, Valerie M.
Frazier, Rachel
Ingram, Stacey A.
Smith, Mary Lou
Wagner, Lynne I.
Zubkoff, Lisa
Tung, Nadine
Wallner, Lauren P.
Wolff, Antonio C.
Source :
JCO Oncology Practice; Feb2023, Vol. 19 Issue 2, pe263-e273, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

PURPOSE As outcomes improve in early-stage breast cancer, clinical trials are undergoing a paradigm shift from intensification trials (more therapy) to improve survival to optimization trials, which assess the potential for using less toxic therapy while preserving survival outcomes. However, little is known about physician perspectives in community and academic settings about possible barriers and facilitators that could affect accrual to optimization clinical trials and the generalizability of future findings. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study with semistructured interviews of medical oncologists from different academic and community practices to assess their perspectives on optimization trials. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. Three independent coders used a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. RESULTS All 39 physicians reported that they would enroll patients in optimization clinical trials. Oncologists highlighted specific reasons to consider optimization trials. These included quality-of-life improvement by reducing toxicity, reduction in financial toxicity, fertility preservation, ability to avoid chemotherapy, minimization of overtreatment in patients with comorbid conditions, personalized treatment, opportunities to test novel therapies, and leveraging the availability of targeted therapies. Oncologists also identified accrual barriers, such as tumor-specific biology, individual (host) factors, prognostic markers of risk, access to therapies, provider experience, and system constraints. They voiced recommendations regarding preliminary data, trial design, and tools to support enrollment in optimization trials. CONCLUSION Although oncologists are generally willing to enroll patients on optimization clinical trials, barriers affect their acceptance. A scientific focus on overcoming these barriers is needed to support future enrollment on trials tailoring therapy on the basis of risk and potential benefit to allow true personalization of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26881527
Volume :
19
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JCO Oncology Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161832791
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00472