Comparison of routine field epidemiology and whole genome sequencing to identify tuberculosis transmission in a remote setting.

MLA

Guthrie, J. L., et al. “Comparison of Routine Field Epidemiology and Whole Genome Sequencing to Identify Tuberculosis Transmission in a Remote Setting.” Epidemiology & Infection, vol. 148, Jan. 2020, pp. 1–7. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820000072.

APA

Guthrie, J. L., Strudwick, L., Roberts, B., Allen, M., McFadzen, J., Roth, D., Jorgensen, D., Rodrigues, M., Tang, P., Hanley, B., Johnston, J., Cook, V. J., & Gardy, J. L. (2020). Comparison of routine field epidemiology and whole genome sequencing to identify tuberculosis transmission in a remote setting. Epidemiology & Infection, 148, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268820000072

Chicago

Guthrie, J. L., L. Strudwick, B. Roberts, M. Allen, J. McFadzen, D. Roth, D. Jorgensen, et al. 2020. “Comparison of Routine Field Epidemiology and Whole Genome Sequencing to Identify Tuberculosis Transmission in a Remote Setting.” Epidemiology & Infection 148 (January): 1–7. doi:10.1017/S0950268820000072.