Back to Search Start Over

Valproic acid as adjuvant treatment for convulsive status epilepticus: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors :
Sharshar, Tarek
Porcher, Raphaël
Asfar, Pierre
Grimaldi, Lamiae
Jabot, Julien
Argaud, Laurent
Lebert, Christine
Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard
Harlay, Marie Line
Chillet, Patrick
Maury, Eric
Santoli, Francois
Blanc, Pascal
Sonneville, Romain
Vu, Dinh Chuyen
Rohaut, Benjamin
Mazeraud, Aurelien
Alvarez, Jean-Claude
Navarro, Vincent
Clair, Bernard
Source :
Critical Care; 1/9/2023, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Generalised convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is a medical emergency. Guidelines recommend a stepwise strategy of benzodiazepines followed by a second-line anti-seizure medicine (ASM). However, GCSE is uncontrolled in 20–40% patients and is associated with protracted hospitalisation, disability, and mortality. The objective was to determine whether valproic acid (VPA) as complementary treatment to the stepwise strategy improves the outcomes of patients with de novo established GCSE. Methods: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in 244 adults admitted to intensive care units for GCSE in 16 French hospitals between 2013 and 2018. Patients received standard care of benzodiazepine and a second-line ASM (except VPA). Intervention patients received a 30 mg/kg VPA loading dose, then a 1 mg/kg/h 12 h infusion, whilst the placebo group received an identical intravenous administration of 0.9% saline as a bolus and continuous infusion. Primary outcome was proportion of patients discharged from hospital by day 15. The secondary outcomes were seizure control, adverse events, and cognition at day 90. Results: A total of 126 (52%) and 118 (48%) patients were included in the VPA and placebo groups. 224 (93%) and 227 (93%) received a first-line and a second-line ASM before VPA or placebo infusion. There was no between-group difference for patients hospital-discharged at day 15 [VPA, 77 (61%) versus placebo, 72 (61%), adjusted relative risk 1.04; 95% confidence interval (0.89–1.19); p = 0.58]. There were no between-group differences for secondary outcomes. Conclusions: VPA added to the recommended strategy for adult GCSE is well tolerated but did not increase the proportion of patients hospital-discharged by day 15. Trial registration No. NCT01791868 (ClinicalTrials.gov registry), registered: 15 February 2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161207912
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04292-7