Tubridge flow diverter alone vs. Tubridge flow diverter and coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching analysis.

MLA

Min Shi, et al. “Tubridge Flow Diverter Alone vs. Tubridge Flow Diverter and Coils for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 13, Dec. 2022, pp. 1–9. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.974354.

APA

Min Shi, Yu Feng, Cheng-Da Zhang, Qing-Wen Tang, Ze-Jin Li, Wen-Yuan Zhao, & Ting-Bao Zhang. (2022). Tubridge flow diverter alone vs. Tubridge flow diverter and coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.974354

Chicago

Min Shi, Yu Feng, Cheng-Da Zhang, Qing-Wen Tang, Ze-Jin Li, Wen-Yuan Zhao, and Ting-Bao Zhang. 2022. “Tubridge Flow Diverter Alone vs. Tubridge Flow Diverter and Coils for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.” Frontiers in Neurology 13 (December): 1–9. doi:10.3389/fneur.2022.974354.