Density-functional theory vs density-functional fits: The best of both.

In a recent paper [A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 214101 (2022)], we compared two Kohn–Sham density functionals based on physical modeling and theory with the best density-functional power series fits in the literature. With only a handful of physically motivated pre-factors, our functionals matched, and even slightly exceeded, the performance of the best power-series functionals on the general main group thermochemistry, kinetics, and noncovalent interactions (GMTKN55) chemical database of Goerigk et al. [Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 32184 (2017)]. This begs the question: how much can their performance be improved by adding power-series terms of our own? We address this question in the present work. First, we describe a series expansion variable that we believe contains more local physics than any other variable considered to date. Then we undertake modest, one-dimensional fits to the GMTKN55 data with our theory-based functional corrected by power-series exchange and dynamical correlation terms. We settle on 12 power-series terms (plus six parent terms) and achieve the lowest GMTKN55 "WTMAD2" error yet reported, by a substantial margin, for a hybrid Kohn–Sham density functional. The new functional is called "B22plus." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]