Back to Search Start Over

Assessing professional identity formation (PIF) amongst medical students in Oncology and Palliative Medicine postings: a SEBA guided scoping review.

Authors :
Teo, Kelly Jia Hui
Teo, Mac Yu Kai
Pisupati, Anushka
Ong, Rui Song Ryan
Goh, Chloe Keyi
Seah, Claire Hui Xian
Toh, You Ru
Burla, Neha
Koh, Natalie Song Yi
Tay, Kuang Teck
Ong, Yun Ting
Chiam, Min
Fong, Warren
Wijaya, Limin
Goh, Suzanne Pei Lin
Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
Source :
BMC Palliative Care; 11/18/2022, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-22, 22p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Introduction to a multi-professional team who are working and caring for the dying, and facing complex moral and ethical dilemmas during Oncology and Palliative Medicine postings influence a medical student's professional identity formation (PIF). However, limited appreciation of PIF, inadequate assessments and insufficient support jeopardise this opportunity to shape how medical students think, feel and act as future physicians. To address this gap, a systematic scoping review (SSR) of PIF assessment methods is proposed. Methods: A Systematic Evidence-based Approach (SEBA) guided SSR of assessments of PIF in medical schools published between 1<superscript>st</superscript> January 2000 and 31<superscript>st</superscript> December 2021 in PubMed, Embase, ERIC and Scopus databases was carried out. Included articles were concurrently content and thematically analysed using SEBA's Split Approach and the themes and categories identified were combined using SEBA's Jigsaw Perspective. The review hinged on the following questions: "what is known about the assessment of professional identity formation amongst medical students?", "what are the theories and principles guiding the assessment of professional identity formation amongst medical students?", "what factors influence PIF in medical students?", "what are the tools used to assess PIF in medical students?", and "what considerations impact the implementation of PIF assessment tools amongst medical students?". Results: Two thousand four hundred thirty six abstracts were reviewed, 602 full-text articles were evaluated, and 88 articles were included. The 3 domains identified were 1) theories, 2) assessment, and 3) implementation in assessing PIF. Differing attention to the different aspects of the PIF process impairs evaluations, jeopardise timely and appropriate support of medical students and hinder effective implementation of PIF assessments. Conclusion: The Krishna-Pisupati model combines current theories and concepts of PIF to provide a more holistic perspective of the PIF process. Under the aegis of this model, Palliative Care and Oncology postings are envisaged as Communities of Practice influencing self-concepts of personhood and identity and shaping how medical students see their roles and responsibilities as future physicians. These insights allow the forwarding of nine recommendations to improve assessments of PIF and shape the design of a PIF-specific tool that can direct timely and personalized support of medical students. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472684X
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Palliative Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160293445
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01090-4