Back to Search Start Over

Information needs of parents of children with congenital anomalies across Europe: a EUROlinkCAT survey.

Authors :
Marcus, Elena
Latos-Bielenska, Anna
Jamry-Dziurla, Anna
Barišić, Ingeborg
Cavero-Carbonell, Clara
Den Hond, Elly
Garne, Ester
Genard, Lucas
Santos, Ana João
Lutke, LRenée
Matias Dias, Carlos
Neergaard Pedersen, Christina
Neville, Amanda J.
Niemann, Annika
Odak, Ljubica
Pierini, Anna
Rico, Juan
Rissmann, Anke
Rankin, Judith
Morris, Joan K.
Source :
BMC Pediatrics; 11/12/2022, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Parents of children who have a congenital anomaly can experience significant worry about their child's health. Access to clear, helpful, and trustworthy information can provide a valuable source of support. In this study the aim was to explore the information needs of parents/carers of children with congenital anomalies across Europe.<bold>Method: </bold>A cross-sectional online survey was developed in nine languages to measure parents' information needs, including: (1) the 'helpfulness'/'trustworthiness' of information received from eight relevant sources, and (2) overall satisfaction with information received. Parents/carers of children (0-10 years) with cleft lip, spina bifida, congenital heart defect [CHD] requiring surgery, and/or Down syndrome were recruited online via relevant organisations in 10 European countries from March-July 2021. Quantitative analyses using multivariable logistic regressions were performed.<bold>Results: </bold>One thousand seventy parents/carers of children with a cleft lip (n = 247), spina bifida (n = 118), CHD (n = 366), Down syndrome (n = 281), and Down syndrome with CHD (n = 58) were recruited in Poland (n = 476), the UK (n = 120), Germany (n = 97), the Netherlands/Belgium (n = 74), Croatia (n = 68), Italy (n = 59), other European countries (n = 92), and not specified/non-European countries (n = 84). Most participants were mothers (92%) and aged 31-40 years (71%). Participants were most likely to rate support groups (63%), patient organisations (60%), specialist doctors/nurses (58%), and social media (57%) as 'very helpful' information sources. 'Very trustworthy' ratings remained high for specialist doctors/nurses (61%), however, they declined for support groups (47%), patient organisations (48%), and social media (35%). Germany had the highest proportion of participants who were 'very satisfied' (44%, 95% CI = 34%-54%) with information, whereas this percentage was lowest in Croatia (11%, 95% CI = 3%-19%) and Poland (15%, 95% CI = 11%-18%). Parents of children with Down syndrome had significantly lower satisfaction ratings than parents of children with CHD; 13% (95% CI = 8%-18%) reported being 'very satisfied' compared to 28% (95% CI = 23%-33%) in the CHD group.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Findings suggest that informal sources of information (e.g. support groups) are of value to parents, however, they are not deemed as trustworthy as specialist medical sources. Satisfaction ratings differed across countries and by anomaly, and were particularly low in Croatia and Poland, as well as for parents of children with Down syndrome, which warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712431
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Pediatrics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160176921
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03734-z