Back to Search Start Over

A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life.

Authors :
Davies, Nathan
Aker, Narin
Vickerstaff, Victoria
Sampson, Elizabeth L
Rait, Greta
Source :
Palliative Medicine; Oct2022, Vol. 36 Issue 9, p1432-1439, 8p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning in dementia does not always happen. As dementia progresses, decisions are often left for family carers to make with professionals. Aim: To test the feasibility and acceptability of the delivery and use of a decision aid for family carers of people with severe dementia or towards the end-of-life. Design: Feasibility study using a before-after design of a paper-based decision aid with family carers of people with severe dementia or towards the end-of-life. Criteria for whether to progress to full evaluation included achieving: 70% recruitment rate of target of 30 people, and retention of 70% at 6 months. Outcome measures at baseline, 3 and 6 months, included: the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), EQ5D-5L and Satisfaction with Care at the End of Life (SWC-EOLD). Participants: Twenty-eight family carers were recruited (93% of target), 26 completed baseline assessment and 20 (71%) of those were followed-up at 6 months. Results: Almost all outcomes changed indicating improvement over 6 months. The DCS and K10 scores decreased indicating less decisional conflict and less psychological distress. The decision aid was acceptable, 25% found it very helpful and 55% a little helpful at 6 months. Conclusion: We met the success criteria demonstrating this study was feasible and acceptable to carers. Future research should test the effectiveness of the decision aid in a full scale evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02692163
Volume :
36
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Palliative Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159809205
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221122379