Back to Search Start Over

Use of e-triggers to identify diagnostic errors in the paediatric ED.

Authors :
Lam, Daniel
Dominguez, Fidelity
Leonard, Jan
Wiersma, Alexandria
Grubenhoff, Joseph A.
Source :
BMJ Quality & Safety; Oct2022, Vol. 31 Issue 10, p735-743, 9p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background Diagnostic errors (DxEs) are an understudied source of patient harm in children rarely captured in current adverse event reporting systems. Applying electronic triggers (e-triggers) to electronic health records shows promise in identifying DxEs but has not been used in the emergency department (ED) setting. Objectives To assess the performance of an e-trigger and subsequent manual screening for identifying probable DxEs among children with unplanned admission following a prior ED visit and to compare performance to existing incident reporting systems. Design/methods Retrospective single-centre cohort study of children ages 0-22 admitted within 14 days of a previous ED visit between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Subjects were identified by e-trigger, screened to identify cases where index visit and hospital discharge diagnoses were potentially related but pathophysiologically distinct, and then these screened-in cases were reviewed for DxE using the SaferDx Instrument. Cases of DxE identified by e-trigger were cross-referenced against existing institutional incident reporting systems. Results An e-trigger identified 1915 unplanned admissions (7.7% of 24 849 total admissions) with a preceding index visit. 453 (23.7%) were screened in and underwent review using SaferDx. 92 cases were classified as likely DxEs, representing 0.4% of all hospital admissions, 4.8% among those selected by e-trigger and 20.3% among those screened in for review. Half of cases were reviewed by two reviewers using SaferDx with substantial inter-rater reliability (Cohen's K=0.65 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.75)). Six (6.5%) cases had been reported elsewhere: two to the hospital's incident reporting system and five to the ED case review team (one reported to both). Conclusion An e-trigger coupled with manual screening enriched a cohort of patients at risk for DxEs. Fewer than 10% of DxEs were identified through existing surveillance systems, suggesting that they miss a large proportion of DxEs. Further study is required to identify specific clinical presentations at risk of DxEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20445415
Volume :
31
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159776599
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013683