Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Safety of Shengxuening Combined with Conventional Iron Supplementation in the Treatment of Anemia during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors :
Li, Tianhang
Wu, Qian
Chen, Yonggang
Zou, Jili
Zhang, Enjing
Source :
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM); 10/13/2022, Vol. 2022, p1-16, 16p, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 9 Graphs
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Shengxuening combined with conventional iron supplementation in the treatment of anemia during pregnancy. Methods. Electronic searches of Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Wanfang database (Wanfang), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were conducted. A randomized controlled trial of Shengxuening combined with conventional iron supplements for the treatment of anemia in pregnancy was included. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook's Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (version 5.1.0), and data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 15.0 statistical software. Results. A total of 150 studies were detected and 17 studies with a total of 1741 cases were finally included. Meta-analysis results showed that the effectiveness of Shengxuening combined with conventional iron supplementation was significantly better than that of conventional iron supplementation alone, and the adverse effects were significantly reduced compared with that of iron supplementation alone, and various anemia indicators such as Hb, RBC, MCV, and MCHC and iron metabolism indicators such as SI and TSAT were also significantly increased. Conclusion. The efficacy of the combination of Shengxuening and conventional iron supplementation in the treatment of anemia in pregnancy is better than that of conventional iron supplementation alone, and the adverse effects in the experimental group are much less than those in the control group, but the quality of the included studies is not high, and more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1741427X
Volume :
2022
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159754336
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1773616