Back to Search Start Over

Flexible Buprenorphine/Naloxone Model of Care for Reducing Opioid Use in Individuals With Prescription-Type Opioid Use Disorder: An Open-Label, Pragmatic, Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Jutras-Aswad, Didier
Le Foll, Bernard
Ahamad, Keith
Lim, Ron
Bruneau, Julie
Fischer, Benedikt
Rehm, Jürgen
Wild, T. Cameron
Wood, Evan
Brissette, Suzanne
Gagnon, Lea
Fikowski, Jill
Ledjiar, Omar
Masse, Benoit
Socias, M. Eugenia
OPTIMA Research Group within the Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse
Source :
American Journal of Psychiatry; Oct2022, Vol. 179 Issue 10, p726-739, 14p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>Extensive exposure to prescription-type opioids has resulted in major harm worldwide, calling for better-adapted approaches to opioid agonist therapy. The authors aimed to determine whether flexible take-home buprenorphine/naloxone is as effective as supervised methadone in reducing opioid use in prescription-type opioid consumers with opioid use disorder.<bold>Methods: </bold>This seven-site, pan-Canadian, 24-week, pragmatic, open-label, noninferiority, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial involved treatment-seeking adults with prescription-type opioid use disorder. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (target dosage, 8 mg/2 mg to 24 mg/6 mg per day; flexible take-home dosing) or oral methadone (≈60-120 mg/day; closely supervised). The primary outcome was the proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens over 24 weeks (noninferiority margin, 15%). All randomized participants were analyzed, excluding one who died shortly after randomization, for the primary analysis (modified intention-to-treat analysis).<bold>Results: </bold>Of 272 participants recruited (mean age, 39 years [SD=11]; 34.2% female), 138 were randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone and 134 to methadone. The mean proportion of opioid-free urine drug screens was 24.0% (SD=34.4) in the buprenorphine/naloxone group and 18.5% (SD=30.5) in the methadone group, with a 5.6% adjusted mean difference (95% CI=-0.3, +∞). Participants in the buprenorphine/naloxone group had 0.47 times the odds (95% CI=0.24, 0.90) of being retained in the assigned treatment compared with those in the methadone group. Overall, 24 drug-related adverse events were reported (12 in the buprenorphine/naloxone group [N=8/138; 5.7%] and 12 in the methadone group [N=12/134; 9.0%]) and mostly included withdrawal, hypogonadism, and overdose.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The buprenorphine/naloxone flexible model of care was safe and noninferior to methadone in reducing opioid use among people with prescription-type opioid use disorder. This flexibility could help expand access to opioid agonist therapy and reduce harms in the context of the opioid overdose crisis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0002953X
Volume :
179
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159441694
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21090964