Back to Search Start Over

Oxygenator impact on meropenem/vaborbactam in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits.

Authors :
Cies, Jeffrey J
Nikolos, Peter
Moore II, Wayne S
Giliam, Nadji
Low, Tracy
Marino, Daniel
Deacon, Jillian
Enache, Adela
Chopra, Arun
Source :
Perfusion; Oct2022, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p729-737, 9p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: To determine the oxygenator impact on alterations of meropenem (MEM)/vaborbactam (VBR) in a contemporary neonatal/pediatric (1/4-inch) and adolescent/adult (3/8-inch) extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit including the Quadrox-i<superscript>®</superscript> oxygenator. Methods: 1/4-inch and 3/8-inch, simulated closed-loop ECMO circuits were prepared with a Quadrox-i pediatric and Quadrox-i adult oxygenator and blood primed. Additionally, 1/4-inch and 3/8-inch circuits were also prepared without an oxygenator in series. A one-time dose of MEM/VBR was administered into the circuits and serial pre- and post-oxygenator concentrations were obtained at 5 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 24-hour time points. MEM/VBR was also maintained in a glass vial and samples were taken from the vial at the same time periods for control purposes to assess for spontaneous drug degradation. Results: For the 1/4-inch circuit, there was an approximate mean 55% MEM loss with the oxygenator in series and a mean 33%–40% MEM loss without an oxygenator in series at 24 hours. For the 3/8-inch circuit, there was an approximate mean 70% MEM loss with the oxygenator in series and a mean 30%–38% MEM loss without an oxygenator in series at 24 hours. For both the 1/4-inch circuit and 3/8-inch circuits with and without an oxygenator, there was <10% VBR loss for the duration of the experiment. Conclusions: This ex-vivo investigation demonstrated substantial MEM loss within an ECMO circuit with an oxygenator in series with both sizes of the Quadrox-i oxygenator at 24 hours and no significant VBR loss. Further evaluations with multiple dose in-vitro and in-vivo investigations are needed before specific MEM/VBR dosing recommendations can be made for clinical application with ECMO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02676591
Volume :
37
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Perfusion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159265888
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591211018985