Back to Search Start Over

Agreement of two vendor-independent strain analysis software platforms in assessing left ventricular global longitudinal strain.

Authors :
Rhee, Tae-Min
Kim, Hyung-Kwan
Choi, You-Jung
Lee, Hyun-Jung
Hwang, In-Chang
Yoon, Yeonyee E.
Kim, Hack-Lyoung
Park, Jun-Bean
Lee, Seung-Pyo
Kim, Yong-Jin
Cho, Goo-Yeong
Source :
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging; 9/1/2022, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p1939-1950, 12p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: The new version of EchoPAC platform was recently developed by General Electronics (GE) to provide 'vendor-independent' full-myocardial-layer left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS). The agreement of the LV-GLS by two vendor-independent software platforms was investigated under diverse clinical situations. Methods: Two-dimensional speckle-tracking LV-GLS was separately measured by two software platforms. LV-GLS values were compared as default setting of each software platform (GE full-myocardial-layer [GE-Full], and TomTec endocardial-layer [TomTec-Endo]). Agreements according to various conditions and type of echocardiography vendors were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Inter-observer reproducibility of each software platform was assessed, and agreements were further evaluated in various subgroups. Results: One hundred five subjects were initial candidates for the current study (normal LV function without any cardiac pathology [n = 25], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [n = 40], dilated cardiomyopathy [n = 25], or restrictive cardiomyopathy [n = 15]). After excluding seven subjects with inadequate tracking quality, 98 subjects were finally analyzed. The average LV-GLS was lower in GE-Full than in TomTec-Endo. Agreement between GE-Full and TomTec-Endo was excellent in general; while the greatest bias was observed in the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy group, with TomTec-Endo exhibiting greater LV-GLS values than GE-Full (bias -1.71, limits of agreement -6.02 to 2.59). Both platforms showed excellent inter-observer reproducibility (GE-Full, ICC 0.99; TomTec-Endo, ICC 0.91), and were in good agreements regardless of the echocardiography vendors or subgroups according to age, heart rate, myocardial wall thickness, or LV ejection fraction. Conclusions: LV-GLS by GE-Full showed excellent agreement with that by TomTec-Endo under various cardiac conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15695794
Volume :
38
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
159100626
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02589-w