Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of Different Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis Marker Vaccines in Calves.

Authors :
Petrini, Stefano
Martucciello, Alessandra
Righi, Cecilia
Cappelli, Giovanna
Torresi, Claudia
Grassi, Carlo
Scoccia, Eleonora
Costantino, Giulia
Casciari, Cristina
Sabato, Roberto
Giammarioli, Monica
De Carlo, Esterina
Feliziani, Francesco
Source :
Vaccines; Aug2022, Vol. 10 Issue 8, p1204-1204, 12p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Three commercially available infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) live marker vaccines were evaluated for their ability to provide clinical protection to vaccinated calves against wild-type (wt) Bovine alphaherpesvirus-1 (BoHV-1) challenge and their possible effect on wt BoHV-1 latency reactivation following the challenge. On 35 post-vaccination days (PVDs), all animals were challenged with wt BoHV-1. Only the calves in the control group developed severe forms of IBR. The reactivation of latent BoHV-1 was induced by dexamethasone (DMS) treatment on 28 post-challenge days (PCDs). All animals showed IBR clinical signs on three post-DMS treatment days (PDTDs). On PVD 14, all vaccinated animals developed neutralizing antibodies (NAs), whereas in control animals, the NAs appeared post-challenge. The positivity for glycoprotein-B (gB) was detected using real-time polymerase chain reactions in all animals from PCDs 1 to 7. In contrast, the gB-positivity was observed in the immunized calves from PDTDs 3 to 10. Positive expression of gD and gE was observed in nasal swabs of all calves on PDTD 7. These findings suggested that the IBR marker vaccines evaluated in this study protected against wt BoHV-1-induced disease but not against wt BoHV-1-induced latency reactivation, indicating the necessity of developing new products to protect animals from wt BoHV-1-induced latency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2076393X
Volume :
10
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Vaccines
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158991239
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081204