Back to Search Start Over

Numerical Simulation Analysis of Difference from a Radial Resistivity Testing Method for Cylindrical Cores and a Conventional Testing Method.

Authors :
He, Jiahuan
Liu, Tangyan
Wen, Long
He, Tingting
Li, Min
Li, Jin
Wang, Li
Yao, Xin
Source :
Mathematics (2227-7390); Aug2022, Vol. 10 Issue 16, p2885-2885, 17p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Rock resistivity is a major geophysical technical parameter in geological and geotechnical engineering, geothermal prospecting, and oil and gas exploration. Its accurate measurement is of great significance to achieve the goal of "carbon peak and carbon neutrality". To solve anisotropic problems, a method to test the radial resistivity in cylindrical core samples has been proposed and has been deemed the universal method, as it has the virtues of no specially processed sample being needed and nondestructive testing. However, there is still a difference in the radial resistivities obtained from this method and another testing method that is commonly used for cuboid samples. Furthermore, the differences between these methods have not yet been made clear in China or elsewhere. Therefore, we compared the results of the above-two testing methods via numerical simulations after establishing the potential field distribution, and, in combination with their methodological principles, illustrated the differences between the resistivities determined in samples with distinct shapes obtained using the two testing methods, summarized the conditions when there was zero difference and considerable difference when using the two methods, and provided a theoretical basis for the reasonable selection of an appropriate method to test the resistivity anisotropy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22277390
Volume :
10
Issue :
16
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Mathematics (2227-7390)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158892072
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/math10162885