Back to Search Start Over

Novel predictive role for mid-regional proadrenomedullin in moderate to severe aortic stenosis.

Authors :
Tan, Eugene S. J.
Yen Yee Oon
Siew Pang Chan
Oi Wah Liew
Chong, Jenny P. C.
Tay, Edgar
Wern Miin Soo
Yip, James W. L.
Gong, Lingli
Lunaria, Josephine B.
Quek Wei Yong
Min Lee, Evelyn
Yeo, Daniel P. S.
Zee Pin Ding
Hak Chiaw Tang
See Hooi Ewe
Chin, Calvin C. W.
Siang Chew Chai, A. Mark
Ping Ping Goh
Lee Fong Ling
Source :
Heart; 8/15/2022, Vol. 108 Issue 16, p1319-1327, 9p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>We investigated the prognostic significance of selected known and novel circulating biomarkers in aortic stenosis (AS).<bold>Methods: </bold>N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity troponin-T (hsTnT), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST2), mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM) and mid-regional proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) were measured in patients with moderate to severe AS, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I-II and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, recruited consecutively across five centres from 2011 to 2018. Their ability to predict both primary (all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation or progression to NYHA class III-IV) and secondary (additionally incorporating syncope and acute coronary syndrome) outcomes was determined by competing risk analyses.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 173 patients with AS (age 69±11 years, 55% male, peak transaortic velocity (Vmax) 4.0±0.8 m/s), the primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 59 (34%) and 66 (38%), respectively. With aortic valve replacement as a competing risk, the primary outcome was determined consistently by the comorbidity index and each selected biomarker except ST2 (p<0.05), independent of NYHA class, Vmax, LV-global longitudinal strain and serum creatinine. MR-proADM had the highest discriminative value for both primary (subdistribution HR (SHR) 11.3, 95% CI 3.9 to 32.7) and secondary outcomes (SHR 12.6, 95% CI 4.7 to 33.5). Prognostic assessment of dual-biomarker combinations identified MR-proADM plus either hsTnT or NT-proBNP as the best predictive model for both clinical outcomes. Paired biomarker models were not superior to those including MR-proADM as the sole circulating biomarker.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>MR-proADM most powerfully portended worse prognosis and should be further assessed as possibly the biomarker of choice for risk stratification in AS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13556037
Volume :
108
Issue :
16
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Heart
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158577913
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320707