Second versus fourth generation of cryoballoon catheters: The 1STOP real‐world multicenter experience.

Background: It has been observed that the fourth‐generation cryoballoon (CB4) ablation catheter increased the rate of acute real‐time recordings of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) during the ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this analysis was to compare the long‐term outcome results between patients treated with the CB4 and second‐generation cryoballoon (CB2). Methods: In total, 492 patients suffering from AF, underwent PVI ablation with either the CB2 or CB4 catheter within this examination of the 1STOP real‐world Italian project and were included in the analysis. Specifically, 246 consecutive patients treated by CB4 were compared to 246 propensity‐matched control patients who underwent PVI using CB2. Results: When comparing the patient cohorts treated with CB2 versus CB4, acute success rate (99.6 ± 4.7% vs. 99.7 ± 3.6%, p =.949) and peri‐procedural complications (3.7% vs.1.2%, p =.080) were similar in both groups, respectively. However, procedure time (100 vs.75 min, p <.001) and fluoroscopy duration (21 vs.17 min, p <.001) were all significantly lower in the CB4 treated patient cohort. At the 12‐month follow‐up, the freedom from AF recurrence after a 90‐day blanking period was significant higher in the CB4 as compared with the CB2 group (93.3% vs.81.3%, p <.001). Conclusions: In summary, usage of the CB4 ablation catheter increased the rate of acute PVI recording capability and resulted in a higher rate of long‐term PVI success, as demonstrated by the reduced rate of AF recurrence in comparison to the CB2 cohort at the 12‐month follow‐up period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]