Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Cross-Education and Global Training Effects in Adults and Youth After Unilateral Strength Training.

Authors :
Chaouachi, Anis
Ben Othman, Aymen
Chaouachi, Mehdi
Hechmi, Abderraouf
Farthing, Jonathan P.
Granacher, Urs
Behm, David G.
Source :
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research; Aug2022, Vol. 36 Issue 8, p2121-2131, 11p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Chaouachi, A, Ben Othman, A, Chaouachi, M, Hechmi, A, Farthing, JP, Granacher, U, and Behm, DG. Comparison of cross-education and global training effects in adults and youth after unilateral strength training. J Strength Cond Res 36(8): 2121–2131, 2022—Youth strength training research examining contralateral, homologous (cross-education), and heterologous (global training) effects after unilateral training have provided mixed results and the relationship to adults has not been compared. The objective was to compare adult and youth cross-education and global training effects on dominant and nondominant limb testing. Initially, 15 men and 15 prepubertal boys volunteered for each unilateral chest press (CP), handgrip training, and control groups (n = 89). Individuals trained their dominant limb 3 times per week for 8 weeks and had their dominant and nondominant limbs tested for CP and leg press 1 repetition maximum (1RM), handgrip, knee extension and flexion, and elbow extension and flexion maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs). Adult CP training gains were significantly greater than youth with lower-body testing (p = 0.002–0.06), whereas youth CP training gains exceeded adults with upper-body tests (p = 0.03–0.07). Training specificity was evident with greater CP 1RM increases with CP vs. handgrip training for both youth (p < 0.0001) and adults (p < 0.0001). Handgrip training elicited greater gains in handgrip MVICs compared with other strength tests (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, only contralateral CP 1RM showed a training advantage for unilateral CP over unilateral handgrip training. Adults showed greater gains with lower-body testing, whereas youth showed greater gains with upper-body testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10648011
Volume :
36
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158315955
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003766