Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte, and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratios for the Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Undifferentiated Inflammatory Arthritis.

Authors :
Song, Byung-Wook
Kim, A-Ran
Kim, Yun-Kyung
Kim, Geun-Tae
Ahn, Eun-Young
So, Min-Wook
Lee, Seung-Geun
Source :
Diagnostics (2075-4418); Jul2022, Vol. 12 Issue 7, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 10p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: To investigate the diagnostic performance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in subjects with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis (UIA). Methods: This retrospective cohort study investigated 201 female patients with UIA (≥1 swollen joint) and 280 age-matched, healthy female controls. "Clinical RA" was defined based on the clinical judgment of a rheumatologist and "disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) RA" was defined as a case of initiating DMARDs treatment within 6 months after the first visit. "Classified RA" was defined as fulfilling the 2010 classification criteria for RA. Receiver operating characteristics were used to determine the optimal cut-off value. Results: UIA patients had a significantly higher NLR, PLR, and MLR than the controls. Among the 201 UIA patients, 65 (32.3%), 63 (31.3%), and 61 (30.3%) subjects were classified as clinical RA, DMARDs RA, and classified RA, respectively. At a cut-off of 0.24, MLR showed moderate accuracy for the diagnosis of DMARDs RA (sensitivity, 65.1%; specificity, 62.3%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.701; p < 0.001). However, the diagnostic accuracies of NLR and PLR were low. Conclusions: MLR may be used as a complementary diagnostic indicator for RA diagnosis in patients with UIA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
12
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Diagnostics (2075-4418)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158212001
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12071702