Grading Systems for Canine Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Comparative Overview.

Simple Summary: Tumor histological grading systems are a tool widely used by human pathologists in oncology to support the assessment of tumor behavior and patient prognosis by clinical oncologists. In veterinary medicine, several tumor types already have a histological grading system used for these purposes, but some of these schemes lack reproducibility or correlation with clinical parameters, such as the correlation of the grade with survival time. This is the case for the grading systems proposed for canine bladder urothelial carcinoma. Over the years, some grading systems have been described for this type of tumor in dogs but without any routine use by pathologists and, consequently, without any application in clinical practice either. Based on this fact, the present study aimed to review the histological grading systems that exist in both human and veterinary medicine for bladder urothelial carcinoma, carrying out a critical analysis of their differences and thereby encouraging their real practical use and application in a relevant number of cases, prospectively. In this way, a histological grading system could be chosen or built from the existing ones and the knowledge about the behavior of this neoplasm in canine species could be improved, helping clinicians to establish a prognosis and personalized treatment for each patient with bladder urothelial carcinoma and also consider the predictive markers associated with treatment outcomes. The relationship between tumor morphology and clinical behavior is a key point in oncology. In this scenario, pathologists and clinicians play a pivotal role in the identification and testing of reliable grading systems based on standardized parameters to predict patient prognosis. Dogs with bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) were recently proposed as a "large animal" model for the study of human BUCs due to the similar morphology and metastasis locations. BUC grading systems are consolidated in human medicine, while in veterinary medicine, the BUC grading systems that have been proposed for canine tumors are not yet applied in routine diagnostics. These latter systems have been proposed, decade by decade, over the last thirty years, and the reason for their scarce application is mainly related to a lack of specific cutoff values and studies assessing their prognostic relevance. However, for any prognostic study, reliable grading is necessary. The aim of the present article was to give an overview of the BUC grading systems available in both human and veterinary pathology and provide an extensive description and a critical evaluation to support veterinary researchers in the choice of possible grading systems to apply in future studies on canine BUCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]