Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of different methodological approaches to identify risk factors of nosocomial infection in intensive care units.

Authors :
de Irala-Estévez, Jokin
Martínez-Concha, Diego
Díaz-Molina, Carmen
Masa-Calles, Josefa
del Castillo, Amparo Serrano
Navajas, Rafael Fernández-Crehuet
de Irala-Estévez, J
Martínez-Concha, D
Díaz-Molina, C
Masa-Calles, J
Serrano del Castillo, A
Fernández-Crehuet Navajas, R
Source :
Intensive Care Medicine; Aug2001, Vol. 27 Issue 8, p1254-1262, 9p
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>Comparison of statistical methods and measurement scales to identify nosocomial infection risk factors in intensive care units (ICU).<bold>Design: </bold>Prospective study in 558 patients admitted to the ICU of a referral hospital between February and November 1994.<bold>Methods: </bold>Analysis using three logistic regression models, three standard Cox regression models, and two Cox regression models with time-dependent extrinsic factors. Different scales were used to measure exposures to risk factors (dichotomous, ordinal, quantitative, and time-dependent variables).<bold>Results: </bold>The most appropriate models were those that measured exposure using dichotomous variables. Models using ordinal or quantitative variables estimated biased coefficients and/or failed to comply with the statistical assumptions underlying the analyses. The Cox regression model with quantitative time-dependent variables met all the statistical assumptions, obtained a precise assessment of risk by exposure time, and estimated unbiased coefficients.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The Cox regression analysis with quantitative time-dependent variables is the most valid alternative for assessing the risk of nosocomial infection per day of exposure to an extrinsic risk factor in the ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03424642
Volume :
27
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Intensive Care Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
15729409
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340101007