Back to Search Start Over

Pretreatment Positron Emission Tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose May Be a Useful New Predictor of Early Progressive Disease following Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors :
Kawamura, Yusuke
Kobayashi, Masahiro
Shindoh, Junichi
Matsumura, Masaru
Okubo, Satoshi
Muraishi, Nozomu
Fujiyama, Shunichiro
Hosaka, Tetsuya
Saitoh, Satoshi
Sezaki, Hitomi
Akuta, Norio
Suzuki, Fumitaka
Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
Ikeda, Kenji
Arase, Yasuji
Hashimoto, Masaji
Kumada, Hiromitsu
Source :
Oncology; 2022, Vol. 100 Issue 6, p320-330, 11p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and Aims: The aim of this study was to identify the utility of <superscript>18</superscript>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG-PET/CT) as a predictor of early progressive disease (e-PD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev). Methods: Twenty consecutive patients with measurable intrahepatic target nodules who received Atezo/Bev treatment were reviewed. The oncological aggressiveness of tumors estimated by <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG-PET/CT was analyzed using the rate of e-PD within 12 weeks and early progression-free survival (e-PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis was used to identify potential confounders for PD during Atezo/Bev therapy. Results: Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, a tumor-to-normal liver ratio (TLR) ≥2, indicating higher oncological aggressiveness in HCCs, was associated with lower objective response rates compared with TLR values <2 (18% vs. 33%, respectively). Moreover, TLR values ≥2 were significantly associated with higher e-PD rates compared with TLR values <2 (64% vs. 11%, respectively) and worse e-PFS (p = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, TLR ≥2 showed marginal significance as a predictor of e-PD (p = 0.053), and utility as a predictor for worse e-PFS (hazard ratio, 7.153; 95% confidence interval, 1.258–40.689; p = 0.027). In contrast, no significant differences in OS with/without e-PD were observed during the treatment course. In this study, 8 patients experienced e-PD and almost 40% of patients experienced acceptable disease control following subsequent lenvatinib treatment. Conclusion: Pretreatment <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG-PET/CT may be a useful new predictor of e-PD and may enable early decision-making based on early treatment changes following Atezo/Bev treatment of HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00302414
Volume :
100
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157229344
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000523850