Back to Search Start Over

Urinary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Cannabidiol (CBD), Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Their Metabolites following Oral and Vaporized CBD and Vaporized CBD-Dominant Cannabis Administration.

Authors :
Sholler, Dennis J
Spindle, Tory R
Cone, Edward J
Goffi, Elia
Kuntz, David
Mitchell, John M
Winecker, Ruth E
Bigelow, George E
Flegel, Ronald R
Vandrey, Ryan
Source :
Journal of Analytical Toxicology; Jun2022, Vol. 46 Issue 5, p494-503, 10p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The market for products containing cannabidiol (CBD) is booming globally. However, the pharmacokinetics of CBD in different oral formulations and the impact of CBD use on urine drug testing outcomes for cannabis (e.g. 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-THCCOOH)) are understudied. This study characterized the urinary pharmacokinetics of CBD (100 mg) following vaporization or oral administration (including three formulations: gelcap, pharmacy-grade syrup and or Epidiolex) as well as vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis (containing 100 mg CBD and 3.7 mg Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-THC) in healthy adults (n  = 18). A subset of participants (n  = 6) orally administered CBD syrup following overnight fasting (versus low-fat breakfast). Urine specimens were collected before and for 58 h after dosing on a residential research unit. Immunoassay (IA) screening (cutoffs: 20, 50 and 100 ng/mL) for Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-THCCOOH was performed, and quantitation of cannabinoids was completed via LC–MS-MS. Urinary CBD concentrations (ng/mL) were higher after oral (mean C<subscript>max</subscript>: 734; mean T<subscript>max</subscript>: 4.7 h, n  = 18) versus vaporized CBD (mean C<subscript>max</subscript>: 240; mean T<subscript>max</subscript>: 1.3 h, n  = 18), and oral dose formulation significantly impacted mean C<subscript>max</subscript> (Epidiolex = 1,274 ng/mL, capsule = 776 ng/mL, syrup = 151 ng/mL, n  = 6/group) with little difference in T<subscript>max</subscript>. Overnight fasting had limited impact on CBD excretion in urine, and there was no evidence of CBD conversion to Δ<superscript>8</superscript>- or Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-THC in any route or formulation in which pure CBD was administered. Following acute administration of vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis, 3 of 18 participants provided a total of six urine samples in which Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-THCCOOH concentrations ≥15 ng/mL. All six specimens screened positive at a 20 ng/mL IA cutoff, and two of six screened positive at a 50 ng/mL cutoff. These data show that absorption/elimination of CBD is impacted by drug formulation, route of administration and gastric contents. Although pure CBD is unlikely to impact drug testing, it is possible that hemp products containing low amounts of Δ<superscript>9</superscript>-THC may produce a cannabis-positive urine drug test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01464760
Volume :
46
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157011906
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkab059