Back to Search Start Over

Decision making for anti-VEGF inhibitor continuation: dip stick? or urine protein/creatinine ratio? (VERSiON UP study).

Authors :
Nakamura, Michio
Funakoshi, Taro
Kataoka, Shigeki
Horimatsu, Takahiro
Nishikawa, Yoshitaka
Matsubara, Takeshi
Mizukami, Takuro
Goto, Tomoyuki
Tsuchihashi, Kenji
Baba, Eishi
Tsumura, Takehiko
Mihara, Yoshiaki
Hamaguchi, Tetsuya
Yanagita, Motoko
Muto, Manabu
Source :
BMC Cancer; 5/7/2022, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Monitoring proteinuria is important for the management of patients with cancer treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti-VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors (VEGF/Ri). Here we investigated the difference between the urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and a qualitative value test (QV) on the decision making of treatment continuation and the usefulness of UPCR testing in patients with gastrointestinal cancer treated with anti-VEGF/Ri.<bold>Methods: </bold>From January 2017 to December 2018, a survey was conducted based on the medical records of patients with gastrointestinal cancer with a QV of ≥2+ during the use of anti-VEGF/Ri at seven Japanese institutions participating in the Onco-nephrology Consortium. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the worst UPCR < 2.0 (low UPCR) in cases with a QV2+ at the point of the first proteinuria onset. The secondary endpoints were a comparison of low UPCR and worst UPCR ≥2.0 (high UPCR), the concordance rate between UPCR and QV in the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading, and the differences in the decision making for anti-VEGF/Ri continuation.<bold>Results: </bold>Among the 71 patients enrolled, the proportion of low UPCR in onset QV2+ (n = 53) was 66% (n = 35). In a comparison between low (n = 36) and high UPCR cases (n = 24), body weight (P = 0.036), onset QV status (P = 0.0134), and worst QV status (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with UPCR levels. The concordance rate for CTCAE Grade 2 of both the QV and UPCR was 83%. Regarding the judgment of anti-VEGF/Ri continuation, treatment was continued in 42.4% of cases when the QV became 3+, whereas only 25% continued treatment when the UPCR value became high.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Urine dipstick test results may overestimate proteinuria, and the UPCR result tended to be more critical than the QV when deciding the treatment policy.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>This study is a multiple institutional retrospectively registered observational trial.<bold>Clinical Trial Number: </bold>University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (protocol ID UMIN000042545 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712407
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156788088
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09611-3