Back to Search Start Over

A randomized controlled trial of stapled versus ultrasonic transection in distal pancreatectomy.

Authors :
Landoni, Luca
De Pastena, Matteo
Fontana, Martina
Malleo, Giuseppe
Esposito, Alessandro
Casetti, Luca
Marchegiani, Giovanni
Tuveri, Massimiliano
Paiella, Salvatore
Pea, Antonio
Ramera, Marco
Borin, Alex
Giardino, Alessandro
Frigerio, Isabella
Girelli, Roberto
Bassi, Claudio
Butturini, Giovanni
Salvia, Roberto
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques; Jun2022, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p4033-4041, 9p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The pancreatic transection method during distal pancreatectomy is thought to influence postoperative fistula rates. Yet, the optimal technique for minimizing fistula occurrence is still unclear. The present randomized controlled trial compared stapled versus ultrasonic transection in elective distal pancreatectomy.<bold>Methods: </bold>Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy from July 2018 to July 2020 at two high-volume institutions were considered for inclusion. Exclusion criteria were contiguous organ resection and a parenchymal thickness > 17 mm on intraoperative ultrasound. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to stapled transection (Endo GIA Reinforced Reload with Tri-Staple Technology®) or ultrasonic transection (Harmonic Focus® + or Harmonic Ace® + shears). The primary endpoint was postoperative pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints included overall complications, abdominal collections, and length of hospital stay.<bold>Results: </bold>Overall, 72 patients were randomized in the stapled transection arm and 73 patients in the ultrasonic transection arm. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 23 patients (16%), with a comparable incidence between groups (12% in stapled transection versus 19% in ultrasonic dissection arm, p = 0.191). Overall complications did not differ substantially (35% in stapled transection versus 44% in ultrasonic transection arm, p = 0.170). There was an increased incidence of abdominal collections in the ultrasonic dissection group (32% versus 14%, p = 0.009), yet the need for percutaneous drain did not differ between randomization arms (p = 0.169). The median length of stay was 8 days in both groups (p = 0.880). Intraoperative blood transfusion was the only factor independently associated with postoperative pancreatic fistula on logistic regression analysis (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.2-20.0, p = 0.032).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The present randomized controlled trial of stapled versus ultrasonic transection in elective distal pancreatectomy demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula rates and no substantial clinical impact on other secondary endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18666817
Volume :
36
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156759775
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08724-3