Back to Search Start Over

Experiences in managing different consequences of forgotten ureteral stents.

Authors :
Xie, Donghua
Hu, Chenbo
Gu, Di
Cai, Cong
Liu, Yongda
Zeng, Guohua
Lei, Ming
Source :
Urology Annals; Apr-Jun2022, Vol. 14 Issue 2, p141-146, 6p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: We reported the different consequences of forgotten stents and share our managing experiences. Patients and Methods: From July 2011 to August 2019, eight patients (five men and three women) with forgotten encrusted ureteral stents were treated by different endoscopic procedures in our center. Plain-film radiography (kidney, ureter, and bladder [KUB]) and computed tomography were used to evaluate the position of stents, the site of encrustation, and the stone burden. Various sole or combined endoscopic techniques including percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy, and cystolitholapaxy were used to achieve stent removal. Results: The average age of the patients was 50.9 years (range: 25–72 years). The mean indwelling time of the stents was 32.9 months (range: 12–83 months). Mean stent stone burden was 15 mm × 10 mm. Three patients had stent stone burden larger than 20 mm. Three patients had a preoperative positive urine culture before treatment. The stent was fragmented in two patients. The ureteral stents and related stones were successfully removed without any complications by a sole or combined endoscopic techniques with stone-free status achieved in all patients. There is no complications occurred. Conclusion: Forgotten stents can lead to complicated urinary tract calculi, stent encrustation, urinary tract infection, vesicoureteric reflux, and even ureteral polyps. Various sole or combined endourological techniques can be used to manage the forgotten encrusted ureteral stents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09747796
Volume :
14
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Urology Annals
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156682535
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_165_20