Back to Search
Start Over
'Quantity does not make quality': when is there a case for repeating a network meta‐analysis?
- Source :
- British Journal of Dermatology; May2022, Vol. 186 Issue 5, p911-913, 3p
- Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- </td><td>The authors need to justify their replication in relation to author influence or conflicts of interest in previously published NMAs</td></tr><tr><td>2-4. For example, if the NMA authors cite this being high-priority research, but do not cite this in comparison with a previously published NMA, they are not assessing priority in relation to the need for replication</td></tr><tr><td>2. </td><td>The assessment of this being a high-priority NMA should be made explicitly in relation to the need for replication of previously published NMAs. [Extracted from the article]
- Subjects :
- DATA extraction
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00070963
- Volume :
- 186
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 156658138
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21017