Back to Search Start Over

Ipsilesional arm training in severe stroke to improve functional independence (IPSI): phase II protocol.

Authors :
Maenza, Candice
Sainburg, Robert L.
Varghese, Rini
Dexheimer, Brooke
Demers, Marika
Bishop, Lauri
Jayasinghe, Shanie A. L.
Wagstaff, David A.
Winstein, Carolee
Source :
BMC Neurology; 4/12/2022, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-16, 16p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: We previously characterized hemisphere-specific motor control deficits in the ipsilesional, lessimpaired arm of unilaterally lesioned stroke survivors. Our preliminary data indicate these deficits are substantial and functionally limiting in patients with severe paresis. Methods: We have designed an intervention ("IPSI") to remediate the hemisphere-specific deficits in the ipsilesional arm, using a virtual-reality platform, followed by manipulation training with a variety of real objects, designed to facilitate generalization and transfer to functional behaviors encountered in the natural environment. This is a 2-site (primary site - Penn State College of Medicine, secondary site - University of Southern California), two-group randomized intervention with an experimental group, which receives unilateral training of the ipsilesional arm throughout 3 one-hour sessions per week for 5 weeks, through our Virtual Reality and Manipulation Training (VRMT) protocol. Our control group receives a conventional intervention on the contralesional arm, 3 one-hour sessions per week for 5 weeks, guided by recently released practice guidelines for upper limb rehabilitation in adult stroke. The study aims to include a total of 120 stroke survivors (60 per group) whose stroke was in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) resulting in severe upper-extremity motor impairments. Outcome measures (Primary: Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Abilhand, Barthel Index) are assessed at five evaluation points: Baseline 1, Baseline 2, immediate post-intervention (primary endpoint), and 3-weeks (short-term retention) and 6-months postintervention (long-term retention). We hypothesize that both groups will improve performance of the targeted arm, but that the ipsilesional arm remediation group will show greater improvements in functional independence. Discussion: The results of this study are expected to inform upper limb evaluation and treatment to consider ipsilesional arm function, as part of a comprehensive physical rehabilitation strategy that includes evaluation and remediation of both arms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712377
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156610548
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02643-z